4.7 Article

Determination of optimal phenanthrene, sulfate and biomass concentrations for anaerobic biodegradation of phenanthrene by sulfate-reducing bacteria and elucidation of metabolic pathway

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 171, Issue 1-3, Pages 1112-1119

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.130

Keywords

Anaerobic biodegradation; Phenanthrene; Sulfate-reducing bacteria

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan, ROC [NSC 95-2221-E-009-107-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anaerobic biodegradation of phenanthrene (PHE) was investigated using an enrichment culture consists predominantly of sulfate-reducing bacteria (87 +/- 6%). Aqueous biodegradation experiments were designed using the rotatable central composite design with five levels. The designed concentrations were 2-50 mg L-1 for PHE, 480-3360 mg L-1 for sulfate, and 5-50 mg L-1 for initial biomass. Experimental results indicated that the biomass concentration was the most significant variable, followed by the sulfate and PHE concentrations. The desirability functions methodology (DFM) was applied to find out the maximum specific PHE removal rate (R-s). The maximum R-s of 9.0 mg g(-1) VSS d(-1) within the designed ranges was obtained when the initial PHE, sulfate and biomass concentrations were 18.5, 841 and 50 mg L-1, respectively. The R-s observed in the present study was higher than the values reported in the previous studies. Subsequently, a confirmation study was performed under the optimal conditions. and the results matched well with the R-s estimated using DFM. Samples collected during PHE biodegradation experiments inferred the formation of two novel metabolic intermediates, 2-methyl-5-hydroxybenzaldehyde and 1-propenyl-benzene, and subsequently degraded to p-cresol, phenol and hydrocarbons. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available