4.7 Article

Dicamba-induced genotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells is prevented by vitamin E

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 163, Issue 1, Pages 337-343

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.097

Keywords

Banvel (R); Cell-cycle kinetics; Dicamba; SCE; Vitamin E

Funding

  1. National University of La Plata [11/N493]
  2. National Agency of Scientific and Technological Promotion [26116]
  3. National Council of Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET) [6386]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study the cytogenetic and genotoxic effect of benzoic herbicide dicamba and its Argentinean commercial formulation banvel (R) (57.71% dicamba) was evaluated and whether this effect is mediated through oxidative damage or not. The protective role of vitamin E was also studied. Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequency, cell-cycle progression, and cell viability analyses in CHO cells were used as in vitro end-points. Treatments with the test compounds were performed either during 24 h (Protocol A) or 12 h (Protocol B) before harvesting. Protocol A showed that vitamin E decreased pesticide SCE induction, corrected the cell-cycle delay and partially protected cell-death only in 500 mu g/ml dicamba-treated cultures. A similar trend was found in banvel (R)-treated cultures. Protocol B revealed similar protective role of vitamin E only for dicamba-induced geno- and cytotoxicity. Based on these observations it could be suggested that dicamba injures DNA by delivering reactive oxygen species rather than by another type of mechanism/s. Although banvel (R) mimics the effect observed by dicamba, its formulation contains other xenobiotic/s agents able to induce cellular and DNA damage by a different mechanism/s. Further investigations are needed to acquire a comprehensive knowledge of the possible mechanism/s through dicamba and banvel (R) exert their toxic effects. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available