4.7 Article

Lichens on asbestos-cement roofs: Bioweathering and biocovering effects

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 162, Issue 2-3, Pages 1300-1308

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.060

Keywords

Asbestos-cement; Biocovering; Bioweathering; Image analysis; Lichen

Funding

  1. Regione Piemonte Direzione regionale 22: Tutela e Risanamento Ambientale, Programmazione, Gestione Rifiuti
  2. CEBIOVEM (The Centre of Excellence for Plant and Microbial Biosensing)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Asbestos-cement roofs, the most widespread sources of airborne, toxic and carcinogenic asbestos fibres, are often colonized by lichens. Since these latter are physical and chemical weathering agents, they have been often considered as significant responsible of disaggregation processes increasing fibre dispersion. Consequently, official guidelines for the management of asbestos often suggest their removal. Weathering and/or covering effects of lichens on asbestos-cement, however, have never been deeply investigated and available procedures to evaluate asbestos-cement aging do not take the biological colonization into account. In this study we show that a 25% lichen cover modifies physical and chemical properties of asbestos-cement sheets containing chrysotile and crocidolite fibres. By innovatively coupling pull up tests and image analysis of linear structures, we show that fibre loss is significantly lower (similar to 30%) where lichens develop and offer a physical barrier to the fibre detachment. Below the most covering lichens (Acarospora cervina, Candelariella ssp.), chrysotile and crocidolite undergo a partial incongruent dissolution, which in laboratory assays generally determined a reduction of their surface reactivity. Because of their biocovering and bioweathering effects, lichens on asbestos-cement play a role which differs from the current public opinion and the assumptions of some official regulations, acting as effective spontaneous bioattenuation agents. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available