4.7 Article

Distribution and mobility of Cr in tannery waste amended semi-arid soils under simulated rainfall

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 171, Issue 1-3, Pages 851-858

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.087

Keywords

Total oxidizable soil Cr (III); Cr fractionation; CO2-C evolved; Dehydrogenase activity; N-mineralization

Funding

  1. Semarnat-Conacyt [2002-COI-0184]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was conducted to evaluate the distribution and mobility of Cr in tannery waste that has been added to semi-arid soils. In addition, the amount of total oxidizable soil Cr (III), Cr (VI), pH and soil microbial activities were determined. Tannery sludge alone or mixed with fleshing waste was added to two types of soils, which were then incubated at 25 degrees C for 6 months and subsequently subjected to simulated rainfall. The highest total amount of Cr loss occurred due to infiltration, regardless of the treatments. The Cr loss ranged from 0.452 to 0.825 mu g g(-1) soil for all soils from 1 to 3 months, with the exception of those that were located under the canopy and treated with tannery sludge and fleshing waste, which had the highest runoff (from 1.312 to 1.667 mu g Cr g(-1) soil). The pH of the soil increased from 1 to 3 months (from 7.35 to 8.46), while the total oxidizable soil Cr (III) (2.12-4.31 mg g(-1) soil) peaked after 1 month of treatment. The majority of the fractionated chromium was bound to carbonates at initial time, 3 and 6 months prior to and after application of the simulated rainfall. The microbial activities decreased in each of the treated soils from initial time to 3 months; however, after 6 months bacterial activity increased, while pH decreased (from 8.03 to 7.63). Overall, these data suggest that pH is responsible for Cr loss in response to infiltration and runoff, Cr speciation and the equilibrium of Cr fractionation. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available