4.7 Article

Treatment of phenolic wastewater in an anaerobic fixed bed reactor (AFBR)-Recovery after shock loading

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 162, Issue 2-3, Pages 1330-1339

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.027

Keywords

Anaerobic; Biodegradation; Phenol; Shockload

Funding

  1. Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD), Bonn

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An anaerobic fixed bed reactor (AFBR) was run for 550 days with a mixed microbial flora to stabilize synthetic wastewater that contained glucose and phenol as main carbon sources. The influent phenol concentration was gradually increased from 2 to 40 mmol/l within 221 days. The microbial flora was able to adapt to this high phenol concentration with an average of 94% phenol removal. Microbial adaptation at such a high phenol concentration is not reported elsewhere. The maximum phenol removal observed before the phenol shock load was 39.47 mmol/l or 3.7 g phenol/l at a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 2.5 days and an organic loading rate (OLR) of 5.3 g/l.d which amounts to a phenol removal rate of ca. 15.8 mmol phenol/l.d. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal before exposing the reactor to a shock load corresponded with phenol removal. A shock load was induced in the reactor by increasing the phenol concentration from 40 to 50 mmol/l in the influent. The maximum phenol removal rate observed after shock load was 18 mmol/l.d at 5.7 g COD/l.d. But this was not a stable rate and a consistent drop in COD and phenol removal was observed for I week, followed by a sharp decline and production of fatty acids. Recovery of the reactor was possible only when no feed was provided to the reactor for I month and the phenol concentration was increased gradually. When glucose was omitted from the influent, unknown intermediates of anaerobic phenol metabolism were observed for some time. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available