4.7 Article

Removal and recovery of Hg(II) from aqueous solution using chitosan-coated cotton fibers

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 167, Issue 1-3, Pages 717-727

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.043

Keywords

Chitosan-coated cotton fiber; Hg(II) removal; Recovery; Adsorption selectivity

Funding

  1. Nature Science Foundation of Shandong Province [2008BS04011, 2005BS11010]
  2. Nature Science Foundation of Ludong University [032912, 20052901, 042920, 08-CXA001, LY20072902]
  3. Educational Project for Postgraduate of Ludong University [Ycx0612]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two types of chitosan-coated cotton fibers (SCCH and RCCH) were applied to remove and recover Hg(II) ions in aqueous solution. The adsorption kinetics and isotherms of the two fibers for Hg(II) were investigated at different temperatures. The results revealed that the adsorption kinetic processes of SCCH and RCCH fibers for Hg(II) followed the pseudo second-order model at lower temperatures and the pseudo first-order model at higher temperatures. Both the Langmuir and Freundlich models well described the adsorption isotherms of SCCH and RCCH fibers for Hg(II) in the temperature range studied. SCCH and RCCH fibers selectively adsorbed Hg(II) from binary ion systems in the presence of Pb(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Cd(II), Zn(II), Co(II), Mn(II) and Ag(I). Increased temperature was beneficial to adsorption. The recovery of Hg(II) from aqueous solutions was also studied as a function of sample flow rate and volume, concentration and volume of eluent, elution rate, quantity of adsorbents added and concomitant ions. The results showed that the two fibers efficiently enriched and recovered Hg(II) in the presence of alkali and alkaline earth metals and some heavy metals under optimum conditions. The RCCH fiber exhibited better stability than the SCCH fiber following repeated use. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available