4.7 Review

Hazardous waste generation and management in China: A review

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 158, Issue 2-3, Pages 221-227

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.106

Keywords

Industrial hazardous waste; Medical waste; Household hazardous waste; Generation; China

Funding

  1. National Key Technologies R&D Program of China [2007BAC16B03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Associated with the rapid economic growth and tremendous industrial prosperity, Continues to be the accelerated increase of hazardous waste generation in China. The reported generation of industrial hazardous waste (IHW) was 11.62 million tons in 2005. which accounted for 1.1% of industrial solid waste (ISW) volume. An average of 43.4% of IHW was recycled. 33.0% was stored, 23.0% was securely disposed, and 0.6% was discharged without Pollution controlling. By the end of 2004, there were 177 formal treatment and disposal centers for IHW management. The reported quantity of IHW disposed in these centers was only 416,000 tons, 65% of which was landfilled, 35% was incinerated. The quantity of waste alkali and acid ranked the first among IHW categories, which accounted for 30.9%. And 39.0% of IHW was generated from the raw chemical materials and chemical products industry sectors. South west China had the maximum generation of IHW, accounted for 40.0%. In addition, it was extrapolated that 740,000 tons of medical wastes were generated per year, of which only 10% was soundly managed. The generation of discarded household hazardous waste (HHW) is another important source of hazardous waste. A great proportion of HHW was managed as municipal solid waste (MSW). Hazardous waste pollution controlling has come into being a huge challenge faced to Chinese environmental management. Crown Copyright (c) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available