4.7 Article

Investigation of the effect of different electrodes and their connections on the removal efficiency of 4-nitrophenol from aqueous solution by electrocoagulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 154, Issue 1-3, Pages 778-786

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.120

Keywords

electrocoagulation; electrode connection; electrode material; 4-nitrophenol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the influence of variables on the removal efficiency of solution containing 4-NP (4-nitrophenol) by D. C. electrocoagulation (EC). The efficiency of different electrode connections and materials (steel 310, Fe, Al, graphite and steel 304) for 4-NP removal is compared. Current density, time of electrolysis, interelectrode distance, supporting electrolyte concentration and stirring rate of the solution were the variables that mostly influenced the 4-NP removal. Initially, a simple electrochemical cell was prepared with an anode and a cathode. Then the effect of each variable was studied separately using aqueous 4-NP in a batch mode. For a solution of 20 mg/L 4-NP + 300 mg/L NaCl with chemical oxygen demand (COD) of approximately 40 mg O-2/L, almost up to 99% 4-NP and 65% COD were removed, when the pH was about 9, time of electrolysis was approximately 10 min, current density was 100 A m(-2), interelctrode distance was 15 nun and stirring rate was 400 rpm. In the second series of experiments, the efficiency of EC cells with monopolar electrodes in series and parallel connections and an EC cell with bipolar electrodes was compared with that of a simple electrochemical cell. The best results obtained when steel 310 and Fe are used as anodes and employing Al and graphite as anodes would not be satisfactory. Also findings show that the types of sacrificial electrodes are not very significant in the removal of 4-NP. In the real wastewater obtained from Tabriz petrochemical plant 52% removal could be achieved after 10 min with using steel 310 as anode and steel 304 as cathode. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available