4.7 Article

Freeze-thaw resistance and chloride-ion penetration of cement-stabilized clay exposed to sulfate attack

Journal

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages 179-188

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.07.041

Keywords

Cement stabilized clay; Sulfate attack; Freeze-thaw resistance; Strength; Penetrability

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [113M202]
  2. Ege University Science and Technology Centre - Technology Transfer Office (EBILTEM) [2014-BIL-009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well known that existence of sulfate in groundwater has adverse effects on strength and permeability of cement stabilized clay. On the other hand, freeze/thaw action also causes a reduction in strength and a subsequent increase in permeability of cement stabilized clay. However, a study concerning the coupled effects of these two phenomena is not encountered in the literature. Therefore, in this study, effects of sulfate attack and freeze-thaw action on strength and penetrability properties of cement stabilized kaolin were investigated within an experimental framework. The results revealed that the use of sulfate resistant cement is more feasible than the use of ordinary Portland cement, when cement stabilized clay is exposed to subsequent effects of freeze-thaw action and sulfate attack. Evidence from test results also proved that, irrespective of cement type, freeze-thaw resistance of cement stabilized clay specimens exposed to sulfate attack was lower than those of sulfate-free specimens. The results including the effects of cement inclusion level, sulfate salt type, curing period, and number of freeze-thaw cycles were presented in detail. Finally, empirical relationships among unconfined compressive strength, freeze-thaw cycles, cement content and curing period were established. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available