4.6 Article

Design and fabrication of SOI micro-ring resonators based on sub-wavelength grating waveguides

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 4791-4803

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.23.004791

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF CBET [0930411, 1264174]
  2. Qatar National Research Fund
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1264174] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  6. Directorate For Engineering [0930411] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Standard silicon photonic strip waveguides offer a high intrinsic refractive index contrast; this permits strong light confinement, leading to compact bends, which in turn facilitates the fabrication of devices with small footprints. Sub-wavelength grating (SWG) based waveguides can allow the fabrication of low loss devices with specific, engineered optical properties. The combination of SWG waveguides with optical micro-resonators can offer the possibility of achieving resonators with properties different from the traditional SOI rings. One important property that SWG rings can offer is decreased light confinement in the waveguide core; this improves the resonator's sensitivity to changes in the cladding refractive index, making the rings ideal for refractive index sensing applications. In this paper, we present the design and experimental characterization of SWG based rings realized on SOI chips without upper cladding (permitting their use as sensors). The fabricated rings offer quality factors in the range of similar to 1k-6k, depending on SWG parameters. Based on the comparison of experimental and simulated data we expect sensitivities exceeding 383 nm/RIU in water and 270 nm/RIU in air, showing excellent potential for use in sensing applications. (C) 2015 Optical Society of America

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available