4.2 Article

Motion Deficit of the Thumb in CMC Joint Arthritis

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
Volume 35A, Issue 9, Pages 1449-1453

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.05.026

Keywords

Thumb CMC joint arthritis; motion analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Idiopathic osteoarthritis (OA) of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a common disabling disease that often causes pain and motion loss. The aims of this study were to characterize the multidimensional motion capability of the thumb CMC joint in a group with severe CMC OA and to compare it with a control group. Methods We included 15 subjects with stage fully CMC OA according to the Eaton/Littler classification, and 15 control subjects. A motion analysis system using surface markers was employed to quantify the maximum boundary of the thumb circumduction envelope during repetitive thumb movements. We measured the area enclosed by the angular circumduction envelope and the ranges of motion (ROM) in multiple directions for the thumb CMC joint. Results Thumb osteoarthritis of the CMC joint stage III/IV resulted in a significantly smaller ROM in flexion/extension (45 degrees +/- 11 degrees for the CMC OA group, 59 degrees +/- 10 degrees for the controls), abduction-adduction (37 degrees +/- 6 degrees for the CMC OA group, 63 degrees +/- 13 degrees for the controls), and pronation-supination (49 degrees +/- 10 degrees for the CMC OA group, 62 degrees +/- 11 degrees for the controls) (p < .01). When analyzing the motion directions in flexion-extension and abduction-adduction separately, there was only a loss of extension and adduction (p < .01). Conclusions Severe stages of thumb CMC OA cause an asymmetrical motion deficit with decreased ROM in extension and adduction, leading to decreased capability of counteropposition. (J Hand Surg 2010;35A:1449-1453. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available