4.2 Article

Individual Finger Sensibility in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
Volume 35A, Issue 11, Pages 1807-1812

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.08.013

Keywords

Carpal tunnel syndrome; finger; sensibility

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [K08 AR060164] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Sensibility testing plays a role in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). No single physical examination test has proven to be of critical value in the diagnosis, especially when compared with electrodiagnostic testing (EDX). The purpose of this study was to define which digits are most affected by CTS, both subjectively and with objective sensibility testing. Methods A prospective series of 35 patients (40 hands) with EDX-positive, isolated CTS were evaluated preoperatively using 2 objective sensibility tests: static 2-point discrimination (2PD) and abbreviated Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWMF) testing. Detailed surveys of subjective symptoms were also collected. Results Patients identified the middle finger as the most symptomatic over all others (51%). Objective 2PD results of each digit mirrored the subjective data, with higher values for the middle finger (mean 6.07 mm, (p < .0001). Values for the index finger failed to show a significant difference from the ulnar-innervated small finger. The most symptomatic finger matched 2PD results in over two thirds of patients. The SWMF testing showed similar, statistically significant results (middle > thumb > index > small). Correlations failed between EDX, symptoms, and SWMF results or 2PD in the index finger. Positive but weak correlation (p = .002, r = .42) was found between EDX and 2PD only in the middle fingers. Conclusions The middle finger is the most likely to show changes in 2PD in patients with positive EDX findings for CTS. Middle finger 2PD is best able to correlate with EDX when compared with 2PD of other digits. The SWMF testing also shows the middle digit testing as more sensitive, but this finding may be difficult to use clinically. (J Hand Surg 2010;35A:1807-1812. Copyright (C) 2010 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available