4.6 Article

Retrieval of snow physical parameters by neural networks and optimal estimation: case study for ground-based spectral radiometer system

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages A1442-A1462

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.23.0A1442

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. GCOM-C/SGLI Mission, JAXA
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [23221004]
  3. Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23221004] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new retrieval algorithm for estimation of snow grain size and impurity concentration from spectral radiation data is developed for remote sensing applications. A radiative transfer (RT) model for the coupled atmosphere-snow system is used as a forward model. This model simulates spectral radiant quantities for visible and near-infrared channels. The forward RT calculation is, however, the most time-consuming part of the forward-inverse modeling. Therefore, we replaced it with a neural network (NN) function for fast computation of radiances and Jacobians. The retrieval scheme is based on an optimal estimation method with a priori constraints. The NN function was also employed to obtain an accurate first guess in the retrieval scheme. Validation with simulation data shows that a combination of NN techniques and optimal estimation method can provide more accurate retrievals than by using only NN techniques. In addition, validation with in-situ measurements conducted by using ground-based spectral radiometer system shows that comparison between retrieved snow parameters with in-situ measurements is acceptable with satisfactory accuracy. The algorithm provides simultaneous, accurate and fast retrieval of the snow properties. The algorithm presented here is useful for airborne/satellite remote sensing. (C) 2015 Optical Society of America

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available