Journal
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 77-82Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31819f934e
Keywords
glaucoma; electrophysiology; pattern electroretinogram; PERG; repeatability; refraction
Categories
Funding
- NIH [EY018190]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of operator and optical defocus on the variability of pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma detection (PERGLA). Methods: Two different operators obtained 2 PERGLA recordings each from 10 healthy participants ( 5 women, mean age 32.1 +/- 10.3 y). In addition, one of the operators obtained recordings in which corrective lenses of various diopters (+/- 0.5, +/- 1, +/- 2, and +/- 3) were used to generate optical defocus in both eyes. The effect of operator on PERGLA amplitude and phase variability was determined using a single nested variance components' analysis model and by using Bland-Altman plots. One-way analysis of variance ( ANOVA) was used to determine the effect of optical defocus on amplitude and phase. Results: Differences in measurements between operators accounted for approximately 26.6% and 18.2% of the total variance for amplitude and phase, respectively. Results were confirmed by the use of Bland-Altman plots. ANOVA identified a significant effect of defocus on mean amplitude (F = 2.65, P = 0.01), but not phase (F = 1.02, P = 0.42). Conclusions: Measurements obtained by different operators can result in significant differences in PERGLA amplitude. In addition, although optical defocus leads to a decrease in PERGLA amplitude by reducing visual acuity, this can be avoided by obtaining J1 or better vision before testing.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available