4.4 Article

A test of common assumptions used to infer subglacial water flow through overdeepenings

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 222, Pages 725-734

Publisher

INT GLACIOL SOC
DOI: 10.3189/2014JoG14J027

Keywords

glacier flow; glacier hydrology; glacier modelling; mountain glaciers; subglacial processes

Funding

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. US National Science Foundation [NSF GLD-0518608]
  3. Canadian Circumpolar Institute
  4. University of Alberta
  5. Alberta Ingenuity Fund
  6. UK Natural Environment Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Borehole instrument records from a cirque glacier with an overdeepened bed are examined to assess the validity of widely held glacial hydrological assumptions. At this glacier, hydraulic-potential calculations suggest water below overburden pressure will flow into the overdeepening, where the steepness of the riegel causes water to pool in the basin and increase in pressure. Our subglacial water pressure data also show high consistent pressures in the overdeepening and the presence of an active, variable-pressure drainage system towards the margin of the cirque. Therefore, we find that although uniform hydraulic-potential calculations are not directly applicable, they can still be useful for interpretation of the subglacial hydrological system. We also examine supercooling assumptions under different pressure and temperature regimes for water flowing over a riegel, driven using our borehole records of subglacial water temperatures that are consistently above the pressure-melting point during the late melt season. Our results show that even a slight increase in basal temperatures relative to the local pressure-melting point is sufficient to prevent a reduction in basal hydraulic conductivity as a result of supercooling freeze-on.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available