4.4 Article

A physically based method for estimating supraglacial debris thickness from thermal band remote-sensing data

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 210, Pages 677-691

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3189/2012JoG11J194

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Dundee
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/C514282/1]
  3. British Council-Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR/CRUI)
  4. Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C514282/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to account for the effects of debris cover in model scenarios of the response of glaciers to climate change and water resource planning, it is important to know the distribution and thickness of supraglacial debris and to monitor its change over time. Previous attempts to map surface debris thickness using thermal band remote sensing have relied upon time-specific empirical relationships between surface temperature and thickness, limiting their general applicability. In this paper, we develop a physically based model that utilizes Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) thermal band remotely sensed imagery and is based on a solution of the energy balance at the debris surface. The model is used to estimate debris thickness on Miage glacier, Italy, and is validated using field debris-thickness measurements and a previously published debris-thickness map. The temporal transferability of the model is demonstrated through successful application to a separate ASTER image from a different year using reanalysis meteorological input data. This model has the potential to be used for regional-scale supraglacial debris-thickness mapping and monitoring for debris up to at least 0.50 m thickness, but improved understanding of the spatial patterns of air temperature, aerodynamic roughness length and thermal properties across debris-covered glaciers is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available