4.4 Article

Snow/atmosphere coupled simulation at Dome C, Antarctica

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 204, Pages 721-736

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3189/002214311797409794

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. IPEV
  2. European Commission [226520]
  3. French Institut National des Sciences de l'Univers program Equipement-Troposphere-Concordia
  4. Meteo-France
  5. CNES
  6. CNRS/INSU
  7. NSF
  8. NCAR
  9. University of Wyoming
  10. Purdue University
  11. University of Colorado
  12. Alfred Wegener Institute
  13. Met Office
  14. ECMWF
  15. PNRA
  16. USAP
  17. BAS
  18. BSRN measurements at Concordia
  19. UCAR [20020793]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using a snow/atmosphere coupled model, the evolution of the surface and near-surface snow temperature is modeled at Dome C, Antarctica, during the period 20-30 January 2010. Firstly, the detailed multilayer snow model Crocus is run in stand-alone mode, with meteorological input forcing data provided by local meteorological observations. The snow model is able to simulate the evolution of surface temperature with good accuracy. It reproduces the observed downward propagation of the diurnal heatwave into the upper 50 cm of the snowpack reasonably well. Secondly, a fully coupled 3-D snow/atmosphere simulation is performed with the AROME regional meteorological model, for which the standard single-layer snow parameterization is replaced by Crocus. In spite of a poor simulation of clouds, the surface and near-surface snow temperatures are correctly simulated, showing neither significant bias nor drifts during the simulation period. The model reproduces particularly well the average decrease of the diurnal amplitude of air temperature from the surface to the top of the 45 m instrumented tower. This study highlights the potential of snow/atmosphere coupled models over the Antarctic plateau and the need to improve cloud microphysics and data assimilation over polar regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available