4.4 Article

The annual glaciohydrology cycle in the ablation zone of the Greenland ice sheet: Part 1. Hydrology model

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 204, Pages 697-709

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3189/002214311797409668

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX08AT85G, NNX07AF15G]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We apply a novel one-dimensional glacier hydrology model that calculates hydraulic head to the tidewater-terminating Sermeq Avannarleq flowline of the Greenland ice sheet. Within a plausible parameter space, the model achieves a quasi-steady-state annual cycle in which hydraulic head oscillates close to flotation throughout the ablation zone. Flotation is briefly achieved during the summer melt season along a similar to 17 km stretch of the similar to 50 km of Bowline within the ablation zone. Beneath the majority of the flowline, subglacial conduit storage 'closes' (i.e. obtains minimum radius) during the winter and 'opens' (i.e. obtains maximum radius) during the summer. Along certain stretches of the flowline, the model predicts that subglacial conduit storage remains open throughout the year. A calculated mean glacier water residence time of similar to 2.2 years implies that significant amounts of water are stored in the glacier throughout the year. We interpret this residence time as being indicative of the timescale over which the glacier hydrologic system is capable of adjusting to external surface meltwater forcings. Based on in situ ice velocity observations, we suggest that the summer speed-up event generally corresponds to conditions of increasing hydraulic head during inefficient subglacial drainage. Conversely, the slowdown during fall generally corresponds to conditions of decreasing hydraulic head during efficient subglacial drainage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available