4.7 Article

Effect of heating rate on gas emissions and properties of fired clay bricks and fired clay bricks incorporated with cigarette butts

Journal

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages 269-276

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2014.12.005

Keywords

Gas emission; Heating rate; Fired clay brick; Cigarette butt; Physical and mechanical properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In general, the firing process of clay bricks generates a range of gas emissions into the atmosphere. At high concentrations, these volatile emissions can be a serious source of environmental pollutions. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different heating rates on gas emissions and properties during the firing of clay bricks and clay bricks incorporated with cigarette butts (CBs). In this investigation, four different heating rates were used: 0.7 degrees C min(-1), 2 degrees C min(-1), 5 degrees C min(-1) and 10 degrees C min(-1). The samples were fired in solid form from room temperature to 1050 degrees C. During the firing cycles, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, hydrogen cyanide and chlorine emissions were measured at different heating rates. All bricks were also tested for their physical and mechanical properties including dry density, compressive strength, tensile strength, water absorption and initial rate of absorption. Results show that gas emissions were reduced significantly with higher heating rates (10 degrees C min) followed by 5 degrees C min(-1) and 2 degrees C min(-1) for both types of brick samples. Higher heating rates also decrease the compressive strength and tensile strength value but demonstrate an insignificant effect on the water absorption properties respectively. In conclusion, a higher heating rate is preferable in terms of decreasing gas emissions and it is also able to produce adequate physical and mechanical properties especially for the CB brick. (c) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available