4.5 Article

Application of the Kriging-Based Response Surface Method to the System Reliability of Soil Slopes

Journal

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000801

Keywords

Slope stability; Uncertainty principles; Reliability; Limit equilibrium; Probabilistic methods

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [41102174]
  2. National 973 Basic Research Program of China [2011CB013800]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) [IRT1029]
  4. Kwang-Hua Fund for College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University
  5. Program for Young Excellent Talents at Tongji University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Response surface methods (RSMs) are attractive approaches for slope reliability analysis because such methods can integrate deterministic numerical slope stability evaluation and reliability analysis. For a slope in layered soils, its performance function is generally non-linear and the system failure probability could be larger than the failure probability of the most critical slip surface. In this study, the applicability of the kriging-based RSM for system reliability of soil slopes is assessed through its application to two slopes with obvious system effects. It is found that the kriging method combined with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) can deliver accurate system failure probability estimation. For comparison, the classical RSM based on the iterative local approximation of the performance function may fail to detect the most critical slip surface. The classical RSM can only calculate the failure probability of one slip surface even if the first-order reliability method or MCS is used. Even when the same calibration samples are used, the second-order polynomial-based RSM is not as accurate as the kriging-based RSM. The results in this study show that the kriging-based RSM is an advantageous and promising approach for calculating the system reliability of soil slopes. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000801. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available