4.3 Article

Observations of wind shear over the Southern Ocean

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012JD017488

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Monash University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thermodynamic structure of the lower troposphere over the Southern Ocean is analyzed by employing over 16 years of high resolution upper air soundings from Macquarie Island (54.62 degrees S, 158.85 degrees E). The soundings are analyzed to develop an understanding of the structure of the boundary layer and wind shear occurring through the lower levels over this region, and to compare this to European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model level reanalysis data for the Year of Tropical Convection (YOTC). A multiple layered structure is commonly observed in the high resolution soundings, and is also observed in YOTC, but with a lower frequency. The climatological mean and variability of a number of variables are calculated for both data sets, which reveals that YOTC performs well, but has weaknesses in modeling the observed moisture and wind fields, particularly evident in wind shear profiles. A distinction between a number of boundary layer types is made, and the frequency with which they occur is quantified for both data sets. This highlights important differences between the observations in the Macquarie Island soundings and the reanalysis product. Proxy cloud fields are constructed for the two data sets, and these suggest that clouds are commonly observed in a region between the top of the boundary layer and a secondary temperature inversion, i.e., a buffer layer in the words of Russell et al. (1998). The peak relative frequency of observing these clouds lies roughly around 912.5 hPa for both data sets. An examination of the wind shear across the cloud boundaries finds wind shear over cloud base occurs more frequently than cloud top, suggesting that the cloud fields are not embedded in a well-mixed boundary layer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available