4.3 Article

Linking emissions of fossil fuel CO2 and other anthropogenic trace gases using atmospheric 14CO2

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011JD017048

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atmospheric CO2 gradients are usually dominated by the signal from net terrestrial biological fluxes, despite the fact that fossil fuel combustion fluxes are larger in the annual mean. Here, we use a six year long series of (CO2)-C-14 and CO2 measurements obtained from vertical profiles at two northeast U.S. aircraft sampling sites to partition lower troposphere CO2 enhancements (and depletions) into terrestrial biological and fossil fuel components (C-bio and C-ff). Mean C-ff is 1.5 ppm, and 2.4 ppm when we consider only planetary boundary layer samples. However, we find that the contribution of C-bio to CO2 enhancements is large throughout the year, and averages 60% in winter. Paired observations of C-ff and the lower troposphere enhancements (Delta(gas)) of 22 other anthropogenic gases (CH4, CO, halo- and hydrocarbons and others) measured in the same samples are used to determine apparent emission ratios for each gas. We then scale these ratios by the well known U.S. fossil fuel CO2 emissions to provide observationally based estimates of national emissions for each gas and compare these to bottom up estimates from inventories. Correlations of Delta(gas) with C-ff for almost all gases are statistically significant with median r(2) for winter, summer and the entire year of 0.59, 0.45, and 0.42, respectively. Many gases exhibit statistically significant winter: summer differences in ratios that indicate seasonality of emissions or chemical destruction. The variability of ratios in a given season is not readily attributable to meteorological or geographic variables and instead most likely reflects real, short-term spatiotemporal variability of emissions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available