4.3 Article

Hydrologic connectivity increases denitrification in the hyporheic zone and restored floodplains of an agricultural stream

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012JG001950

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Nature Conservancy of Indiana
  2. Indiana Department of Environmental Management
  3. Arthur J. Schmitt Foundation
  4. GLOBES
  5. NSF IGERT [0504495]
  6. Glynn Family Honors Program
  7. College of Science from the University of Notre Dame

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stream ecotones, specifically the lateral floodplain and subsurface hyporheic zone, can be important sites for nitrogen (N) removal via denitrification, but their role in streams with constructed floodplains has not been examined. We studied denitrification in the hyporheic zone and floodplains of an agriculturally influenced headwater stream in Indiana, USA, that had floodplains added as part of a two-stage ditch restoration project. To examine the potential for N removal in the hyporheic zone, we seasonally measured denitrification rates and nitrate concentrations by depth into the stream sediments. We found that nitrate concentration and denitrification rates declined with depth into the hyporheic zone, but denitrification was still measureable to a depth of at least 20 cm. We also measured denitrification rates on the restored floodplains over the course of a flood (pre, during, and post-inundation), and also compared denitrification rates between vegetated and non-vegetated areas of the floodplain. We found that floodplain denitrification rates increased over the course of a floodplain inundation event, and that the presence of surface water increased denitrification rates when vegetation was present. Stream ecotones in midwestern, agriculturally influenced streams have substantial potential for N removal via denitrification, particularly when they are hydrologically connected with high-nitrate surface water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available