4.3 Article

Observed variation in the decay time of oceanic whitecap foam

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012JC008147

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation, Physical Oceanography Division [1061050]
  2. Office Of Naval Research, Ocean Acoustics Division [N00014-10738, N00014-11030]
  3. Irish Research Council
  4. Marie Curie Actions
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1061050] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Whitecap foam decay times for 552 individual breaking waves determined from digital images of the sea surface are reported. The images had sub-centimeter pixel resolution and were acquired at frame rates between 3 and 6 frames per second at the Martha's Vineyard Coastal Observatory over a 10-day period in 2008, subdivided into 4 observation periods. Whitecap foam decay times for individual events varied between 0.2 s to 10.4 s across the entire data set. A systematic positive correlation between whitecap foam decay time and maximum whitecap foam patch area was found for each observation period. For a given whitecap size within each observation period, the decay times varied between a factor of 2 and 5, with the largest variation occurring during unsteady environmental forcing conditions. Within observation periods, bin-averaged decay times varied by up to a factor of 4 across the range of foam patch areas. Between observation periods, the effective whitecap foam decay time, which we define as the area-weighted mean decay time, varied by a factor of 3.4 between 1.4 s and 4.8 s. We found a weak correlation between decay times and individual event-averaged breaking wave speeds. The variation in the active breaking area across all 4 observation periods was small, indicating relatively uniform surface whitecap area generating potential. We speculate that the variation in the foam decay times may be due to (i) the effect of surfactants on bubble and foam stability, and (ii) differences between bubble plume characteristics caused by a variation in breaking wave type.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available