4.3 Article

Sparse regularization for precipitation downscaling

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011JD017057

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA-GPM [NNX07AD33G]
  2. University of Minnesota
  3. National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics, an NSF Science and Technology Center [EAR-0120914]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [0956072] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [0915064] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Downscaling of remotely sensed precipitation images and outputs of general circulation models has been a subject of intense interest in hydrometeorology. The problem of downscaling is basically one of resolution enhancement, that is, appropriately adding details or high frequency features onto a low-resolution observation or simulated rainfall field. Invoking the property of rainfall self similarity, this mathematically ill-posed problem has been approached in the past within a stochastic framework resulting in ensemble of possible high-resolution realizations. In this work, we recast the rainfall downscaling into an ill-posed inverse problem and introduce a class of nonlinear estimators to properly regularize it and obtain the best high-resolution estimate in an optimal sense. This regularization capitalizes on two main observations: (1) precipitation fields are sparse when transformed into an appropriately chosen domain (e. g., wavelet), and (2) small-scale organized precipitation features tend to recur within and across different storm environments. We demonstrate the promise of the proposed methodology through downscaling and error analysis of level III precipitation reflectivity snapshots provided by the ground-based next generation Doppler weather radars in a ground validation sites of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available