4.3 Article

Electron source associated with dipolarization at the outer boundary of the radiation belts: Non-storm cases

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012JA018084

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [ATM-0852508]
  2. NASA [NNX09AI53G]
  3. CAS Visiting Professorship for Senior International Scientists
  4. [NAS5-02099]
  5. NERC [NE/H004076/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H004076/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Directorate For Geosciences
  8. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [0852508] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. NASA [115016, NNX09AI53G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examine the strength of the electron source associated with dipolarization at the outer boundary of the radiation belts using multisatellite observations from THEMIS. This topic is relevant to the determination on the relative roles of inward radial diffusion versus internal local acceleration for the origin of the relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt. We focus on the electron phase space density (PSD) as a function of the first adiabatic invariant (mu) for equatorially mirroring population over a broad energy range. It is found that the source strength associated with dipolarization for non-storm periods at the outer boundary of the radiation belts can be well above the observed fluxes of relativistic electrons inside the outer radiation belt. The PSD change due to the magnetic field strength variation dominates over PSD change from the energy flux increase with dipolarization, resulting in a strong anticorrelation between magnetic field strength and PSD values at a given mu. If observations from closely spaced satellites during the same event can be used to indicate radial transport of electrons with dipolarization, then the observed PSD at these satellites indicates frequent occurrence of non-adiabatic process during their radial transport.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available