4.3 Article

Observational evidence of Alfven wings at the Earth

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012JA017628

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SA 1772/1-2, GOA/2009-009, G.0729.11, C 90347]
  2. European Commission [269299, 262468]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The solar wind at the orbit of the Earth is usually strongly super-Alfvenic and super-fast, causing a bow-shock to be formed upstream of the Earth's magnetosphere. We here present observational evidence that during 24 and 25 May 2002, the solar wind at the Earth was sub-Alfvenic (with an Alfven Mach number as low as 0.4 in the rest frame of the Earth) and was therefore sub-fast for time periods of up to four hours. The low Alfven Mach number implies that the Earth's bow-shock disappeared and two Alfven wings formed. These Alfven wings are two structures on both the East and West side of the Earth's magnetosphere, where the solar wind plasma is decelerated and the magnetic field direction changes. We present observations of the Geotail spacecraft, which are consistent with Geotail entering the foot of one of these Alfven wings. We estimate that these wings reached an extension of 600 R-E. Even though Alfven wings are present at several moons in the solar system (e.g., Io, Europa, Enceladus) and are likely to occur at some extrasolar planets, this is the first time that they are observed at the Earth. We also study how the Earth is affected by this transition from a super-fast to a sub-Alfvenic environment and how the Alfven wings are affected by the constantly varying solar wind. The sub-Alfvenic solar wind is due to very low density in the solar wind. While the solar wind Alfven Mach number was very low, the magnetosphere was geomagnetically extremely quiet. Whereas the SYM-H index indicates a recovery phase from a small to moderate magnetic storm; the AL and AU indices show no substorm activity. In addition, there was almost no auroral activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available