4.3 Article

First observational evidence for opposite zonal electric fields in equatorial E and F region altitudes during a geomagnetic storm period

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2012JA018045

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The strong westward electrojet and simultaneous upward drift of the equatorial ionospheric peak observed over South-East Asia and Indian equatorial regions during the prolonged Dst minimum phase of an intense geomagnetic storm during 14-15 December 2006 are investigated for the altitudinal variation of zonal electric field polarity using ground based and space-borne observations. The results show first observational evidence for simultaneous existence of daytime westward and eastward zonal electric fields at equatorial E and F region altitudes, respectively, in a wide longitude sector. While the westward electric fields at E region altitudes cause westward electrojet, at the same time, the eastward zonal electric fields at F region altitudes cause the upward drift of the equatorial ionospheric peak and reinforcement of the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) even in the topside ionosphere (similar to 660 km). The reversal of the electric fields is found to occur at similar to 280 km height. A clear bifurcation of F region plasma at similar to 280 km is evident in the iso-electron density contours due to these oppositely polarized zonal electric fields, which manifests as an unusually deep cusp between F-1 and F-2 layers on equatorial ionograms. Citation: Tulasi Ram, S., N. Balan, B. Veenadhari, S. Gurubaran, S. Ravindran, T. Tsugawa, H. Liu, K. Niranjan, and T. Nagatsuma (2012), First observational evidence for opposite zonal electric fields in equatorial E and F region altitudes during a geomagnetic storm period, J. Geophys. Res., 117, A09318, doi:10.1029/2012JA018045.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available