4.3 Article

Phytoplankton production from melting ponds on Arctic sea ice

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2011JC007717

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. State Ocean Administration (SOA) of China
  2. Polar Academic Program (PAP)
  3. Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI) [PM11080]
  4. Pusan National Research Grant
  5. NOAA Arctic Office through CIFAR [NA05OAR4601077, NA17RJ1224]
  6. Ocean Exploration Hidden Ocean: Phase II [G-2394]
  7. Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) [PM11080] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, the areal extent of melt ponds within sea ice has rapidly increased during the Arctic Ocean summer. However, the biological impacts of melt ponds on the Arctic marine ecosystem have rarely been studied. Carbon and nitrogen uptake rates of phytoplankton were measured at 26 different melt ponds in 2005 and 2008, using a C-13-N-15 dual stable isotope tracer technique. Generally, the open ponds had relatively higher nutrients than closed ponds, but the nutrient concentrations in the open ponds were within a range similar to those in surrounding surface seawaters. Chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentrations in melt ponds ranged from 0.1 to 2.9 mg Chl a m(-3) with a mean of 0.6 mg Chl a m(-3) (SD = +/- 0.8 mg Chl a m(-3)) in the Canada Basin in 2005, whereas the range of the Chl a concentrations was from 0.1 to 0.3 mg Chl a m(-3) with a mean of 0.2 mg Chl a m(-3) (SD = +/- 0.1 mg Chl a m(-3)) in the central Arctic Ocean in 2008. The average annual carbon production in sea ice melt ponds was 0.67 g C m(-3) (SD = +/- 1.03 g C m(-3)) in the Arctic Ocean. Based on this study, recent annual carbon production of all melt ponds was roughly estimated to be approximately 2.6 Tg C, which is less than 1% of the total production in the Arctic Ocean.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available