4.7 Article

Green pigments of Roman mural paintings from Seville Alcazar

Journal

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages 211-219

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.016

Keywords

Roman wall painting; Celadonite; Glauconite; Egyptian blue; Egyptian green; Support

Funding

  1. CHARISMA - FP7 [228330]
  2. Spanish Commission Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CICYT) [BIA2009-12618]
  3. Junta de Andalucia [TEP-6558]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report here a study of 30 fragments of green wall paintings from Roman times found in the Patio de Banderas excavation in Seville Alcazar. The sample characterisation was realised using optical microscopy, colourimetry, infrared and micro-Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The study of these pigments is important because it can help determine the source or the pictorial technique used. The samples studied in this work have been divided into two groups, according to the composition of their green pigments. In the first group, celadonite has been characterised as the primary component of the green colour; chlorite was also detected. Particles constituted by chromium accompanied by aluminium, iron and zinc were found in all studied samples of this group. Chlorite and chromium oxide could also be responsible for the green colour. The presence of chromium suggested the presence of green colour pigment from Verona. In the second group, a mixture of celadonite and glauconite was detected and could be responsible for the green colour observed. The addition of refracting material such as Egyptian blue was also used. A mixture of Egyptian green and Egyptian blue together with celadonite and glauconite was also found. Four classes of intonaco were recognised and classified based upon the composition of the aggregates. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available