4.6 Article

Ultra efficient silicon nitride grating coupler with bottom grating reflector

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 23, Issue 20, Pages 26305-26312

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.23.026305

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB301704]
  2. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Yong Scholars [61125501]
  3. NSFC Major International Joint Research Project [61320106016]
  4. NSFC [61275072, 61475050]
  5. New Century Excellent Talent Project in Ministry of Education of China [NCET-13-0240]
  6. Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
  7. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2014CFA004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We theoretically propose a silicon nitride (Si3N4) grating coupler (GC) with both ultrahigh efficiency and simplified fabrication processes. Instead of using a bottom distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) or metal reflector, a bottom Si grating reflector (GR) with comparable reflectivity is utilized to improve the coupling efficiency. The fully etched Si GR is designed based on an industrially standard silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer with 220 nm top Si layer. By properly adjusting the trench width and period length of the Si GR, a high reflectivity over 90% is obtained. The Si3N4 GC is optimized based on a common 400 nm Si3N4 layer sitting on the Si GR with a SiO2 separation layer. With an appropriate distance between the Si3N4 GC and bottom Si GR, a low coupling loss of -1.47 dB is theoretically obtained using uniform GC structure. A further record ultralow loss of -0.88 dB is predicted by apodizing the Si3N4 GC. The specific fabrication processes and tolerance are also investigated. Compared with DBR, the bottom Si GR can be easily fabricated by single step of patterning and etching, simplifying the fabrication processes. (C)2015 Optical Society of America

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available