4.3 Article

Magnetosonic Mach number dependence of the efficiency of reconnection between planetary and interplanetary magnetic fields

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2009JA014330

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. STFC [PP/E000983/1, PP/E007929/1]
  2. STFC [PP/E007929/1, PP/E000983/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E000983/1, PP/E007929/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a statistical investigation into the magnetosonic Mach number dependence of the efficiency of reconnection at the Earth's dayside magnetopause. We use the transpolar voltage V-PC, derived from radar observations of the ionospheric electric field, as a proxy for the dayside reconnection voltage. Our results show that the IMF clock angle dependence of V-PC is closely approximated by the function f(theta) = sin(2)(theta/2), which we use in the derivation of a solar wind transfer function E* = E(SW)f(theta), wherein ESW is the solar wind electric field. We find that V-PC is strongly related to E*, increasing almost linearly with small E* but saturating as E* becomes high. We also find that E* is strongly dependent on the magnetosonic Mach number, M-MS, decreasing to near-zero values as M-MS approaches 12, due principally to decreasing values of the IMF strength. V-PC, on the other hand, is only weakly related to M-MS and, for lower, more usual values of E*, actually shows a modest increase with increasing M-MS. This result has implications for the solar wind-magnetosphere interaction at the outer planets where the Mach number is typically much higher than it is at 1 AU. Examples of SuperDARN convection maps from two high Mach number intervals are also presented, illustrating the existence of fairly typical reconnection driven flows. We thus find no evidence for a significant reduction in the magnetopause reconnection rate associated with high magnetosonic Mach numbers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available