4.3 Article

Estuarine forcing of a river plume by river flow and tides

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
Volume 113, Issue C9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2008JC004844

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Sciences and Engineering Research Council [246274]
  2. B.C. Ferry Services, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estuarine forcing of a river plume by river discharge and tides is examined with a novel data set capable of characterizing semidiurnal to annual time scales. An instrumented ferry made high-resolution salinity measurements as it crossed the Fraser River plume, British Columbia, Canada, eight times per day over the years 2003-2006. The relative contribution of different forcing factors in controlling the river plume salinity and surface area is examined over the full range of time scales. A Lomb-Scargle periodogram of the plume salinity shows energy concentrated in the semidiurnal and diurnal tidal bands. Diurnal lines contain more energy relative to semidiurnal lines than the respective tidal constituents would suggest. At fortnightly frequencies, local maxima in plume salinity coincide with periods of maxima in daily tidal height, with no phase shift. Thus the estuary adjusts quickly to changes in forcing. The effectiveness of tides in setting the plume salinity is a function of river discharge and is greatest when the river discharge is high and minimal when the river discharge is low. Tidal effects are superimposed onto the long-period river discharge cycle. At time scales of 25 days or longer, the mean river plume salinity decreases quasi-linearly with increasing river discharge, but the change in salinity with river discharge is instantaneous to within the sampling resolution. Plume surface area increases with river discharge, from 200-500 km(2) at low river flow to 1000-1500 km(2) at high river flow. The magnitude of the surface area is predicted well by scaling the mouth deformation radius.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available