4.6 Article

A discursive construction of the Belt and Road Initiative: From neo-liberal to inclusive globalization

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 1199-1214

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11442-018-1520-y

Keywords

Belt and Road Initiative; globalization; neo-liberalism; inclusive globalization; China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41530751]
  2. National Social Science Foundation of China [17VDL008]
  3. Project of Bureau of International Cooperation of the CAS [131A11KYSB20170014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An international consensus is emerging around the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) proposed by the Chinese government, with a growing number of countries seeing it as a way of jointly exploring new international economic governance mechanisms. Meanwhile, with the crisis of neo-liberalism, economic globalization has arrived at a crossroad. In particular, incessant voices speak out against globalization, making the quest for a new way of promoting global development a major challenge. In this context, more and more political elites and scholars consider that the BRI opens up a possible new globalization path, amongst which inclusive globalization warrants exploration. On the basis of a brief analysis of the course and mechanism of global economic expansion and the limitations of neo-liberal globalization, along with the putting into practice of the BRI, this paper outlines some of the core features of inclusive globalization, i.e., inclusive growth with effective and efficient government regulation; inclusive infrastructure development; inclusive development paths chosen nationally that suit national conditions; inclusive participation; and cultural inclusiveness. Although these features are not sufficient to characterize fully inclusive globalization, they do identify some directions for future research, and provide elements of a discursive construction of the BRI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available