4.3 Article

Kinematic interpretation of present-day crustal deformation in central Greece from continuous GPS measurements

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 1-13

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2013.06.004

Keywords

GPS; Permanent network; Time series analysis; Crustal extension; Greece

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We processed 30-s GPS data from continuous GPS stations in central Greece using the Kalman filtering approach and accounting for time-correlated noise content obtaining a velocity field in the ITRF2008 and the Eurasian-fixed reference frame. The station distribution allowed us to compute 1D strain through rates of baseline length changes as well as to construct the image of the 2D strain and rotation rate fields. The obtained baselines range in length from 11 to 132 km and show rates from -1.95 mm/yr up to 14.14 mm/yr (estimated uncertainties from 0.3 to 0.8 mm/yr), while the calculated 1D strain rate ranges from -27 ns/yr up to 226 ns/yr (average uncertainty similar to 15 ns/yr). Largest extension (192-226 ns/yr) is observed in the western and central part of the Corinth rift while similar extension rates (80-120 ns/yr) are obtained for the eastern part of the Corinth rift and its continuation in the south Viotia-south of Evia region and across the Sperchios-Kammena Vourla rift. The coherent picture of the velocity pattern for Attica and north-eastern Peloponnese (Corinth) stations indicates that these areas belong to the same crustal block, separating by the Viotia region by a nearly E-W crustal discontinuity along the Kaparelli-Asopos valley faults. However, some internal strain is present within Attica's crust as well as across the Saronic Gulf resulting in extension rates of the order of 25 ns/yr. We also find extension (54-71 ns/yr) across rigid Peloponnese taken by normal faults in the greater Kalavryta region. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available