4.3 Article

Estimate of glacial isostatic adjustment uplift rate in the Tibetan Plateau from GRACE and GIA models

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages 59-66

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2013.05.002

Keywords

Glacial isostatic adjustment; GRACE; Tibetan Plateau

Funding

  1. National Keystone Basic Research Program (MOST 973) [2012CB72000]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJCX2-EW-T03]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11173050]
  4. Shanghai Pujiang Talent Program Project [11PJ1411500]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Tibetan Plateau is located in central Asia with the highest mountain and extraordinary size, where geodynamic processes are very complex. The Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) effect in the Tibetan Plateau has been highly controversial because the past and present dimensions of ice sheets are suffering from large uncertainties. Larger differences in GIA estimates are found from different models or analyses based on the possible ice sheet and glacial history in Tibet. Present-day space geodetic techniques, such as Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), are able to detect the vertical mass displacement and CIA uplift. In this paper, the GIA effects in the Tibetan Plateau are estimated and evaluated with GRACE measurements and GIA models. Four global CIA models and four regional models (RM) are respectively used to estimate the CIA uplift rates with various ice sheet models and viscoelastic Earth models, which are compared with GRACE measurements. Results show that the uplift rates of CIA effects range from 1 mm/yr to 2 mm/yr in the most part of the Tibetan Plateau. The global GIA model constructed by Peltier (Peltier, 2004) provides better estimations of the CIA in the Tibetan Plateau than the other three models. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available