4.3 Article

The Late Triassic and Late Jurassic stress fields and tectonic transmission of North China craton

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS
Volume 50, Issue 3-4, Pages 318-324

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2009.11.007

Keywords

North China craton; Mesozoic stress fields; Tectonic transmission; Tanlu Fault; Qinling-Dabie-Sulu Orogens

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [40172066, 40314141, 40772121]
  2. China National Key Basic Research Project 973 [2009CB219302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The transmission of the tectonic regime from the Paleo-Asian Ocean to the Pacific Ocean during Mesozoic era was reconstructed using the modeling of Late Triassic (T-3) and Late Jurassic (J(3)) stress fields employing two dimensional linear finite element models (2-D FEM). The model at T-3 proposes that Qinling-Dabie-Sulu orogens coevally collided and the model J(3) proposes that Subei block continued to collide with the North China block along the Sulu orogen while the collision of the Qinling-Dabie orogen was terminated. The stress fields at T-3 and J(3) during the two episodes were calculated based on mechanical conditions under different deviatoric stresses acting along the boundaries of the North China craton by elastic finite modeling. The transmission between two episodes of stress fields resulted from Qinling-Dabie-Sulu collision between North China and South China in the Late Triassic period, and from continued collision between the Subei block and North China by the NW-trending movement of Izanagi plate during Late Jurassic. The results from modeling of the Mesozoic stress fields of the North China suggest that late Jurassic was the key transmission period of the tectonic regime of the North China block when large scale thrusting triggered the subsequent destruction of the North China craton. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available