4.7 Article

On the accurate numerical evaluation of geodetic convolution integrals

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEODESY
Volume 85, Issue 8, Pages 519-538

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-011-0451-5

Keywords

Convolution integrals; Mean kernel; Point kernel; Numerical integration; Gauss-Legendre quadrature; Kernel weighting factor

Funding

  1. ARC [DP0663020]
  2. iVEC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the numerical evaluation of geodetic convolution integrals, whether by quadrature or discrete/fast Fourier transform (D/FFT) techniques, the integration kernel is sometimes computed at the centre of the discretised grid cells. For singular kernels-a common case in physical geodesy-this approximation produces significant errors near the computation point, where the kernel changes rapidly across the cell. Rigorously, mean kernels across each whole cell are required. We present one numerical and one analytical method capable of providing estimates of mean kernels for convolution integrals. The numerical method is based on Gauss-Legendre quadrature (GLQ) as efficient integration technique. The analytical approach is based on kernel weighting factors, computed in planar approximation close to the computation point, and used to convert non-planar kernels from point to mean representation. A numerical study exemplifies the benefits of using mean kernels in Stokes's integral. The method is validated using closed-loop tests based on the EGM2008 global gravity model, revealing that using mean kernels instead of point kernels reduces numerical integration errors by a factor of similar to 5 (at a grid-resolution of 10 arc min). Analytical mean kernel solutions are then derived for 14 other commonly used geodetic convolution integrals: Hotine, Eotvos, Green-Molodensky, tidal displacement, ocean tide loading, deflection-geoid, Vening-Meinesz, inverse Vening-Meinesz, inverse Stokes, inverse Hotine, terrain correction, primary indirect effect, Molodensky's G1 term and the Poisson integral. We recommend that mean kernels be used to accurately evaluate geodetic convolution integrals, and the two methods presented here are effective and easy to implement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available