4.6 Article

Application of singularity analysis for mineral potential identification using geochemical data - A case study: Nanling W-Sn-Mo polymetallic metallogenic belt, South China

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 61-72

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.08.006

Keywords

Singularity analysis; C-A method; Nanling belt; W-Sn-Mo polymetallic deposits; Mineral potential mapping

Funding

  1. Program of Integrated Prediction of Mineral Resources in Covered Areas [1212011085468]
  2. research project on Quantitative models for prediction of strategic mineral resources in China by China Geological Survey [201211022]
  3. Program on Mineral Resource Quantitative Assessment in China by China Geological Survey [1212011121045, 1212011121040]
  4. MOST Special Fund from the State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences [MSFGPMR201003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Nanling W-Sn-Mo polymetallic belt located in southern China is endowed with considerable mineral resources, especially W-Sn-Mo polymetallic deposits. Most of these deposits were formed within a short time interval at the age of Yanshanian. In this paper, singularity analysis within a context multifractal was used to identify weak anomalies hidden within geochemical background. The C-A method was applied in the determination of threshold values of three elements (W, Sn and Mo) using derived geochemical singularity indices. Using the threshold values, each of the three singularity maps was classified into three levels based on singularity indices, and then classified maps were integrated by the raster-value overlay method. The resultant W-Sn-Mo polymetallic prospectivity map generated not only highlights known areas of W-Sn-Mo mineralization, but also identifies high potential areas with no known mineral occurrences. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available