4.6 Article

Arsenic speciation in soils and Erica andevalensis Cabezudo & Rivera and Erica australis L. from Sao Domingos Mine area, Portugal

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages 51-59

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.06.012

Keywords

Iberian Pyrite Belt; Heathers; Arsenic speciation; Phytostabilisation

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [CTM2007-66724-C02/TECNO, CGL2010-21956-C02]
  2. Regional Government of Andalucia (Spain) [CVI-282, FPDI-2004]
  3. Ministry of Education (Spain)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arsenic is very abundant in the Iberian Pyrite Belt (IPB) and it might have hazardous consequences for plants. The chemical speciation is an important factor to take into account in toxicity evaluations. Arsenate is analogous to phosphate and it can seriously interfere with cellular processes. In the present study we have analysed by high performance liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (HPLC-ICP-MS) the arsenic speciation in soils from Sao Domingos mine area (IPB) and arsenate resulted to be the major species. The arsenic content and speciation analysis have been carried out also in two metal tolerant species from that area: Erica andevalensis, endemic heather from the mining areas of the Southwest Iberian Peninsula, and Erica australis, a widely distributed species. The total content of arsenic ranged in soils from 194 to 7924 mg kg(-1) (dry mass), and from 1 to 24.4 mg kg(-1) in E. andevalensis and from 2.7 to 11.6 mg kg(-1) in E. australis. The organic forms of arsenic were almost absent, with only dimethylarsinate (DMA) found in some samples of E. andevalensis. These plant species must possess different tolerance mechanisms, as E. australis accumulates mainly arsenite, while in E. andevalensis arsenate is the most abundant species in some cases. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available