4.6 Article

An assessment of selected heavy metal contamination in the surface sediments from the South China Sea before 1998

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages 1-14

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2010.08.002

Keywords

Metal contamination; Surface sediments; South China Sea (SCS)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40872071, 41072068, 41030423]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2006CB403502]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Northwest University [BJ091349]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry [SKLEG5001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapid economic development in East Asian countries has inevitably resulted in environmental degradation in the surrounding seas, and concern for both the environment and protection against pollutants is increasing. Identification of sources of contaminants and evaluation of current environmental status are essential to environmental pollution management, but relatively little has been done in the South China Sea (SCS). In order to investigate the metal pollution status and source within the SCS, a total of 52 surface sediment samples were collected in 1998 from the SCS for the selected heavy metal measurements such as Pb, Zn, Cu, V. Cr, Cd and Sc. The total concentrations (in mg kg(-1) dry weight) in sediments ranged and averaged (mean +/- S.D.): Pb, 4.18 to 58.7 (23.6 +/- 8.93): Zn, 10.7 to 346 (87.4 +/- 47.7); Cu, 5.29 to 122 (38.1 +/- 24.6); V.0.03 to 148 (78.0 +/- 37.0): Cr, 4.48 to 589 (105 86); Cd, 0.08 to 2.14 (0.40 +/- 0.40) and Sc, 0.33 to 20.6 (10.6 +/- 4.4), respectively. Enrichment factor (EF) values and geoaccumulation indexes (I-geo) suggest that Cu, Pb, Zn and V contamination exists only in few localized areas, but Cr and Cd contamination can be found in large-scale area of the SCS before 1998. Further studies are needed to reconstruct deposition history and for trend analysis. (C) 2010 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available