4.7 Article

Development and high-throughput genotyping of substitution lines carring the chromosome segments of indica 9311 in the background of japonica Nipponbare

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS
Volume 38, Issue 12, Pages 603-611

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2011.11.004

Keywords

Oryza sativa L.; Chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs); Molecular marker-assisted selection; High-throughput resequencing

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program [2012CB944803, 2011CB100202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [31071383]
  3. National Special Program for Transgenic Research [2009ZX08009-008B]
  4. Jiangsu Government of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs) are useful for the precise mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and dissection of the genetic basis of complex traits. In this study, two whole-genome sequenced rice cultivars, the japonica Nipponbare and indica 9311 were used as recipient and donor, respectively. A population with 57 CSSLs was developed after crossing and back-crossing assisted by molecular markers, and genotypes were identified using a high-throughput resequencing strategy. Detailed graphical genotypes of 38 lines were constructed based on resequencing data. These CSSLs had a total of 95 substituted segments derived from indica 9311, with an average of about 2.5 segments per CSSL and eight segments per chromosome, and covered about 87.4% of the rice whole genome. A multiple linear regression QTL analysis mapped four QTLs for 1000-grain weight. The largest-effect QTL was located in a region on chromosome 5 that contained a cloned major QTL GW5/qSW5 for grain size in rice. These CSSLs with a background of Nipponbare may provide powerful tools for future whole-genome discovery and functional study of essential genes/QTLs in rice, and offer ideal materials and foundations for japonica breeding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available