4.4 Article

Lack of transmission of a human influenza virus with avian receptor specificity between ferrets is not due to decreased virus shedding but rather a lower infectivity in vivo

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 1822-1831

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.031203-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MRC [G0600504]
  2. MRC [G0600504] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0600504] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Influenza virus attaches to host cells by sialic acid (SA). Human influenza viruses show preferential affinity for alpha 2,6-linked SA, whereas avian influenza viruses bind alpha 2,3-linked SA. In this study, mutation of the haemagglutinin receptor-binding site of a human H3N2 influenza A virus to switch binding to alpha 2,3-linked SA did not eliminate infection of ferrets but prevented transmission, even in a co-housed model. The mutant virus was shed from the noses of ferrets directly inoculated with virus in the same amounts and for the same length of time as wild-type virus. Mutant virus infection was localized to the same anatomical regions of the upper respiratory tract of directly inoculated animals. Interestingly, wild-type virus was more readily neutralized than the mutant virus in vitro by ferret nasal washes containing mucus. Moreover after inoculation of equal doses, the mutant virus grew poorly in ex vivo ferret nasal turbinate tissue compared with wild-type virus. The dose of mutant virus required to establish infection in the directly inoculated ferrets was 40-fold higher than for wild-type virus. It was concluded that minimum infectious dose is a predictor of virus transmissibility and it is suggested that, as virus passes from one host to another through stringent environmental conditions, viruses with a preference for alpha 2,3-linked SA are unlikely to inoculate a new mammalian host in sufficient quantities to initiate a productive infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available