4.4 Article

Genetic diversity and population structure of rice stripe virus in China

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 1025-1034

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.006858-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Scientific and Technological Foundation of China [39900091, 30000002]
  2. Natural Scientific and Technological Foundation of Fujian province [B0110014]
  3. Ministry of Education of China [020401]
  4. Natural Scientific and Technological Foundation of Yunnan province [2003C0042M]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rice stripe virus (RSV) is one of the most economically important pathogens of rice and is repeatedly epidemic in China, Japan and Korea. The most recent outbreak of RSV in eastern China in 2000 caused significant losses and raised serious concerns. In this paper, we provide a genotyping profile of RSV field isolates and describe the population structure of RSV in China, based on the nucleotide sequences of isolates collected from different geographical regions during 1997-2004. RSV isolates could be divided into two or three subtypes, depending or) which gene was analysed. The genetic distances between subtypes range from 0.050 to 0.067. The population from eastern China is composed only of subtype I/IB isolates. In contrast, the population from Yunnan province (southwest China) is composed mainly of subtype II isolates, but also contains a small proportion of subtype I/IB isolates and subtype IA isolates. However, subpopulations collected from different districts in eastern China or Yunnan province are not genetically differentiated and show frequent gene flow. RSV genes were found to be under strong negative selection. Our data suggest that the most recent outbreak of RSV in eastern China was not due to the invasion of new RSV subtype(s). The evolutionary processes contributing to the observed genetic diversity and population structure are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available