4.3 Article

Domain IV voltage-sensor movement is both sufficient and rate limiting for fast inactivation in sodium channels

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 142, Issue 2, Pages 101-112

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201310998

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM084140-01, GM30376, T32-HL 07936]
  2. Shaw Scientist Award
  3. American Heart Association (Midwest Affiliate) Postdoctoral Fellowship [12POST9440021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Voltage-gated sodium channels are critical for the generation and propagation of electrical signals in most excitable cells. Activation of Na+ channels initiates an action potential, and fast inactivation facilitates repolarization of the membrane by the outward K+ current. Fast inactivation is also the main determinant of the refractory period between successive electrical impulses. Although the voltage sensor of domain IV (DIV) has been implicated in fast inactivation, it remains unclear whether the activation of DIV alone is sufficient for fast inactivation to occur. Here, we functionally neutralize each specific voltage sensor by mutating several critical arginines in the S4 segment to glutamines. We assess the individual role of each voltage-sensing domain in the voltage dependence and kinetics of fast inactivation upon its specific inhibition. We show that movement of the DIV voltage sensor is the rate-limiting step for both development and recovery from fast inactivation. Our data suggest that activation of the DIV voltage sensor alone is sufficient for fast inactivation to occur, and that activation of DIV before channel opening is the molecular mechanism for closed-state inactivation. We propose a kinetic model of sodium channel gating that can account for our major findings over a wide voltage range by postulating that DIV movement is both necessary and sufficient for fast inactivation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available