Journal
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 1028-1034Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2249-4
Keywords
cognitive enhancement; nootropics; amphetamine salts; methylphenidate; medical students; drug use
Funding
- Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Nonmedical use of prescription psychostimulants such as methylphenidate and amphetamine salts for the purpose of cognitive enhancement is a growing trend, particularly in educational environments. To our knowledge, no recent studies have evaluated the use of these psychostimulants in a medical academic setting. To conduct an online census of psychostimulant use among medical students. In 2011, we conducted a multi-institutional census using a 31-48 item online survey regarding use of prescription psychostimulants. 2,732 actively enrolled medical students at four private and public medical schools in the greater Chicago area. Prevalence and correlates of psychostimulant use 1,115 (41 %) of students responded to the web-based questionnaire (range 26-47 % among schools). On average, students were 25.1 years of age (SD = 2.7, range 20-49), and single (70 %). Overall, 18 % (198/1,115) of this medical student sample had used prescription psychostimulants at least once in their lifetime, with first use most often in college. Of these, 11 % (117/1,115) of students reported use during medical school (range 7-16 % among schools). Psychostimulant use was significantly correlated with use of barbiturates, ecstasy, and tranquilizers (Pearson's correlation r > 0.5, Student's t-test p < 0.01); male gender (21 % male versus 15 % female, Chi squared p = 0.007); and training at a medical school which by student self-report determined class rank (68 % versus 51 %, Chi-squared p = 0.018). Non-users were more likely to be first year students (Chi-squared p = 0.048) or to have grown up outside of the United States (Chi-squared p = 0.013). Use of psychostimulants, including use without a prescription, is common among medical students. Further study of the side effects, medical implications, and use during post-graduate medical training and medical practice is needed to inform evidence-based policy. (C) Society of General Internal Medicine 2012
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available