4.6 Article

Teaching the Use of Respiratory Inhalers to Hospitalized Patients with Asthma or COPD: a Randomized Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 1317-1325

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2090-9

Keywords

respiratory inhalers; teach-to-goal; hospitalized patients; health literacy; asthma; COPD

Funding

  1. Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Chicago CTSA from the National Center for Research Resources [UL1RR024999]
  2. National Institutes of Health [HL101618]
  3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [HS016967]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hospitalized patients frequently misuse their respiratory inhalers, yet it is unclear what the most effective hospital-based educational intervention is for this population. To compare two strategies for teaching inhaler use to hospitalized patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A Phase-II randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled hospitalized adults with physician diagnosed asthma or COPD. Hospitalized adults (age 18 years or older) with asthma or COPD. Participants were randomized to brief intervention [BI]: single-set of verbal and written step-by-step instructions, or, teach-to-goal [TTG]: BI plus repeated demonstrations of inhaler use and participant comprehension assessments (teach-back). The primary outcome was metered-dose inhaler (MDI) misuse post-intervention (< 75% steps correct). Secondary outcomes included DiskusA (R) misuse, self-reported inhaler technique confidence and prevalence of 30-day health-related events. Of 80 eligible participants, fifty (63%) were enrolled (BI n = 26, TTG n = 24). While the majority of participants reported being confident with their inhaler technique (MDI 70%, DiskusA (R) 94%), most misused their inhalers pre-intervention (MDI 62%, DiskusA (R) 78%). Post-intervention MDI misuse was significantly lower after TTG vs. BI (12.5 vs. 46%, p = 0.01). The results for DiskusA (R) were similar and approached significance (25 vs. 80%, p = 0.05). Participants with 30-day acute health-related events were less common in the group receiving TTG vs. BI (1 vs. 8, p = 0.02). TTG appears to be more effective compared with BI. Patients over-estimate their inhaler technique, emphasizing the need for hospital-based interventions to correct inhaler misuse. Although TTG was associated with fewer post-hospitalization health-related events, larger, multi-centered studies are needed to evaluate the durability and clinical outcomes associated with this hospital-based education.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available