4.6 Article

Relationship of Opioid Use and Dosage Levels to Fractures in Older Chronic Pain Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 310-315

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1218-z

Keywords

fracture; opioids; elderly; survival; chronic pain

Funding

  1. National Institute of Drug Abuse [DA022557]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Opioids have been linked to increased risk of fractures, but little is known about how opioid dose affects fracture risk. To assess whether risk of fracture increases with opioid dose among older patients initiating sustained use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. A cohort study that uses Cox proportional hazards models to compare fracture risk among current opioid users vs. persons no longer using opioids. Members of an integrated health care plan (N = 2,341) age 60 years and older who received 3+ opioid prescriptions within a 90-day period for chronic, non-cancer pain between 2000 and 2005. Time-varying measures of opioid use and average daily dose in morphine equivalents were calculated from automated data. Fractures were identified from automated data and then validated through medical record review. Compared with persons not currently using opioids, opioid use was associated with a trend towards increased fracture risk (1.28 (95% CI (0.99, 1.64 )). Higher dose opioid use (a parts per thousand yen50 mg/day) was associated with a 9.95% annual fracture rate and a twofold increase in fracture risk (2.00 (95% CI (1.24, 3.24)). Of the fractures in the study cohort, 34% were of the hip or pelvis, and 37% were associated with inpatient care. Higher doses (a parts per thousand yen50 mg/day) of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain were associated with a 2.00 increase in risk of fracture confirmed by medical record review. Clinicians should consider fracture risk when prescribing higher-dose opioid therapy for older adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available