4.6 Article

When Is Social Support Important? The Association of Family Support and Professional Support with Specific Diabetes Self-management Behaviors

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 1992-1999

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0814-7

Keywords

diabetes; self-management; social support; community based participatory research; Hispanic Americans; African Americans

Funding

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cooperative Agreement [U50/CCU417409]
  2. Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center [NIDDK P60DK-20572]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Social support is associated with better diabetes self-management behavior (SMB), yet interventions to increase family and friend support (FF support) have had inconsistent effects on SMB. OBJECTIVE: To test whether FF support differentially affects specific SMBs and compare the influence of support from health professionals and psychological factors on specific SMBs to that of FF support. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of people with diabetes recruited for a self-management intervention PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: One hundred sixty-four African-American and Latino adults with diabetes living in inner-city Detroit MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For every unit increase in FF support for glucose monitoring, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of completing testing as recommended was 1.77 (95% CI 1.21-2.58). FF support was not associated with four other SMBs (taking medicines, following a meal plan, physical activity, checking feet). Support from non-physician health professionals was associated with checking feet [AOR 1.72 (1.07-2.78)] and meal plan adherence [AOR = 1.61 (1.11-2.34)]. Diabetes self- efficacy was associated with testing sugar, meal plan adherence, and checking feet. Additional analyses suggested that self- efficacy was mediating the effect of FF support on diet and checking feet, but not the FF support effect on glucose monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: The association between FF support and SMB performance was stronger for glucose monitoring than for other SMBs. Professional support and diabetes self- efficacy were each independently associated with performance of different SMBs. SMB interventions may need to differentially emphasize FF support, self-efficacy, or professional support depending on the SMB targeted for improvement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available