4.6 Article

Development of a revised health care system distrust scale

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 727-732

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0575-3

Keywords

health care system; technical competence; distrust; values

Funding

  1. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [R01HG002689] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NHGRI NIH HHS [R01 HG02689, R01 HG002689] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CONTEXT: Growing evidence suggests that most forms of distrust are multidimensional, including domains of technical competence and value congruence. Prior measures of health care system distrust have not reflected this multidimensional structure and may be limiting research into the role of health care system distrust in health and health care in the US. OBJECTIVE: To develop a revised a scale of health care system distrust. DESIGN: Three phase study, including focus groups, pilot testing and a cross-sectional telephone survey. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 404 individuals recruited directly from the Greater Philadelphia area or through the University of Pennsylvania Health System. RESULTS: Multilevel consensus coding of focus group transcripts identified 2 primary domains of competence and values with the values domain having subthemes of honesty, motives, and equity. Iterative testing of the initial 76 items led to a final scale of 9 items with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.83. Factor analysis demonstrated a 2-factor structure, corresponding to the domains of values and competence. The values subscale (5 items) had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.73 and the competence subscale (4 items) had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.77. These psychometric properties were similar among African Americans and Whites. CONCLUSIONS: A novel 9-item scale of Health Care System Distrust with high reliability allows the assessment of the 2 primary domains of distrust (values and competence) and may facilitate research in this area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available